In the movie, The Devil Wears Prada, publishing powerhouse Miranda tells lowly assistant Andie, "If you want this life [fame and presumably fortune], those kind of decisions [the self-serving ones] are necessary." Andie isn't sure. She says, "What if I don't want this?" Miranda replies, "Don't be silly. Everyone wants this."
Even the most shallow, cursory look at our society provides plenty of evidence in support of the statement that everyone wants fame. In my profession - Marketing - it's an axiom. Not long ago I read a blog post that began by stating the assumption that everyone using Twitter wanted to be the one with the most followers. What would be the point otherwise? I remember thinking, "What if I don't want that?" To which the absent blogger replied, "Don't be silly. Everyone wants that."
I don't. In this brave new world - where achievement is measured in connections, friends, subscribers and followers - I'm a slacker. By choice. It's not that I go around randomly unfriending people on Facebook in order to maintain a predetermined level of mediocrity, it's just that I pretty much let it take care of itself and have what I have. The same goes for Twitter, my blog and LinkedIn. Why? Because the number of connections, friends, subscribers and followers is not at all related to why I use those applications and would not be an accurate measure of success for me.
I use social media applications for two reasons. First because they are fun. Well...with the exception of LinkedIn. Second so that I can learn the technical aspects of their implementation and see how people with creative, effective profiles and posts accomplish that. The former is for me. The latter is for my vocation.
What most people don't realize is the amount of time it takes to be a popular, successful author of social media content. For the people who do it well, it's their job or a large part of it. I had a conversation with the writer at Telling The Truth. She was asking me questions about my blog - the same one you're reading now - and I explained that I only posted once a week on Sunday. I talked a little bit about how to make blogs successful and then told her that I didn't do any of it because if I did, I wouldn't have time for the project that I was working on with them or any others like it.
Over 3000 years ago, a man named Solomon was king over the nation of Israel. King Solomon is well known for his wisdom, wealth and many wives. It also seems that he died a disillusioned, bitter old man. In the book of Ecclesiastes, he enumerates his many accomplishments: "I made great works. I built houses and planted vineyards for myself. I made myself gardens and parks and planted in them all kinds of fruit trees...I also had great possessions of herds and flocks...I gathered for myself silver and gold and the treasure of kings and provinces...so I became great and surpassed all who were before me in Jerusalem." Then he says, "I considered all that my hands had done and the toil I had expended doing it, and all was vanity and striving after the wind."
That's depressing. Solomon had everything we think is cool even today. Wine. Women. Song. And at the end of his life, he called it meaningless. And you know what? I bet he's not the first or the last to feel that way. He's only the most well known and widely quoted. Didn't he have anything positive to say at all? Sort of. He continues, "What I have seen to be good and fitting is to eat and drink and find enjoyment in all the toil with which one toils under the sun the few days of his life that God has given him...for he will not much remember the days of his life because God keeps him occupied with joy in his heart." From a 21st century perspective, that's a little better, but not much. Why? Because we don't look at work as something that should bring us joy, we look at it as a set of numerical objectives to achieve.
That's our loss. I feel very blessed to be able to do work that I love most of the time. Everyone, everywhere in the world has to do some kind of work. In Sudan, that might mean pounding grain or carrying water. In Cambodia, it might mean sewing apparel, which is better than some of the alternatives, including sexual slavery. This knowledge gives me a profound gratitude for the blessing of satisfying work. However, as Solomon says, eventually I will die, leaving all that I produced for someone else. As will every single one of you reading this. How is it possible to go through life knowing that and not become cynical?
I think Solomon missed something very important. The most significant, eternal things happen in the context of personal relationships. Think about it. If that's true, one of the most important decisions we ever make will be who is to be the beneficiary of our intellectual, spiritual and emotional capital. To whom do we communicate our ideas, our love and our essential self? To strangers? To people who may or may not understand it, feel it or be changed by it? Or to those who are closest to us? Those to whom we are in some way irreplaceable - perhaps because we are family, or friend, or even the only person willing and able to do an essential job. I believe this is where, even in a time bound world, we move past the temporal and into the eternal.
I am passionate about the idea of bringing the best of 21st century communication to people and groups who work with the most persecuted, deprived and needy people in our world and helping them to connect with the people who are willing to support them in some way. I want to find ways to do this, even if it is just one person and one ministry at a time. When I am dead, if I am to be rescued from the obscurity that is the lot of nearly every person who has lived and died in this world, then I hope it will be through the success of those I served because their success brings the possibility of life-transforming change to those they serve, and so on. It's the proverbial pebble in the pond. It disappears the moment it is thrown into the water. By the time the final ripple reaches the shore, it's no longer possible to tell where the stone first entered, or that it was ever there, but its effect has spread across an entire pond.
I believe that influence is more important than fame. And not just any kind of influence. Skin to skin influence. The kind that comes from the life you live and the example you set through your actions. If I don't have that, the skill with which I communicate and the thoughts in my head and the size of my audience are meaningless. If I do have it, I don't really need the rest, do I?
It's possible that some day I could become well known. Not very likely, but if it does it's going to be like buttermilk and butter - the by-product, not the goal. I have no desire to have the most followers on Twitter, the most friends on Facebook, the most subcribers to my blog or the most connections on LinkedIn. I don't want to be the next great novelist or a world famous writer. What I do want is to "to be joyful and to do good as long as I live...to eat and drink and take pleasure in my toil [as] this is God's gift to man." And to be as great at my work as it's possible for me to be. That's all.